farcasclaudiu/TradingAgents
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/farcasclaudiu/TradingAgents.git synced 2026-06-29 09:01:26 +03:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

refactor: five-tier rating scale and streamlined agent prompts

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Yijia-Xiao
2026-03-22 23:07:20 +00:00
parent c3ba3bf428
commit 318adda0c6
11 changed files with 38 additions and 28 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
tradingagents/agents/risk_mgmt/aggressive_debator.py
+1 -1
View File
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ Market Research Report: {market_research_report}
Social Media Sentiment Report: {sentiment_report}
Latest World Affairs Report: {news_report}
Company Fundamentals Report: {fundamentals_report}
Here is the current conversation history: {history} Here are the last arguments from the conservative analyst: {current_conservative_response} Here are the last arguments from the neutral analyst: {current_neutral_response}. If there are no responses from the other viewpoints, do not hallucinate and just present your point.
Here is the current conversation history: {history} Here are the last arguments from the conservative analyst: {current_conservative_response} Here are the last arguments from the neutral analyst: {current_neutral_response}. If there are no responses from the other viewpoints yet, present your own argument based on the available data.
Engage actively by addressing any specific concerns raised, refuting the weaknesses in their logic, and asserting the benefits of risk-taking to outpace market norms. Maintain a focus on debating and persuading, not just presenting data. Challenge each counterpoint to underscore why a high-risk approach is optimal. Output conversationally as if you are speaking without any special formatting."""
tradingagents/agents/risk_mgmt/conservative_debator.py
+1 -1
View File
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ Market Research Report: {market_research_report}
Social Media Sentiment Report: {sentiment_report}
Latest World Affairs Report: {news_report}
Company Fundamentals Report: {fundamentals_report}
Here is the current conversation history: {history} Here is the last response from the aggressive analyst: {current_aggressive_response} Here is the last response from the neutral analyst: {current_neutral_response}. If there are no responses from the other viewpoints, do not hallucinate and just present your point.
Here is the current conversation history: {history} Here is the last response from the aggressive analyst: {current_aggressive_response} Here is the last response from the neutral analyst: {current_neutral_response}. If there are no responses from the other viewpoints yet, present your own argument based on the available data.
Engage by questioning their optimism and emphasizing the potential downsides they may have overlooked. Address each of their counterpoints to showcase why a conservative stance is ultimately the safest path for the firm's assets. Focus on debating and critiquing their arguments to demonstrate the strength of a low-risk strategy over their approaches. Output conversationally as if you are speaking without any special formatting."""
tradingagents/agents/risk_mgmt/neutral_debator.py
+1 -1
View File
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ Market Research Report: {market_research_report}
Social Media Sentiment Report: {sentiment_report}
Latest World Affairs Report: {news_report}
Company Fundamentals Report: {fundamentals_report}
Here is the current conversation history: {history} Here is the last response from the aggressive analyst: {current_aggressive_response} Here is the last response from the conservative analyst: {current_conservative_response}. If there are no responses from the other viewpoints, do not hallucinate and just present your point.
Here is the current conversation history: {history} Here is the last response from the aggressive analyst: {current_aggressive_response} Here is the last response from the conservative analyst: {current_conservative_response}. If there are no responses from the other viewpoints yet, present your own argument based on the available data.
Engage actively by analyzing both sides critically, addressing weaknesses in the aggressive and conservative arguments to advocate for a more balanced approach. Challenge each of their points to illustrate why a moderate risk strategy might offer the best of both worlds, providing growth potential while safeguarding against extreme volatility. Focus on debating rather than simply presenting data, aiming to show that a balanced view can lead to the most reliable outcomes. Output conversationally as if you are speaking without any special formatting."""